Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Edgar Quintanilla v. Otis Stanton, et al
as 17-14141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDGAR QUINTANILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
OTIS STANTON, In his individual and official capacity, DOUG WILLIAMS, In his individual and official capacity, ERIC SMOKES, Tier II Unit Manager, in his individual and official capacity and others
Funk #176013 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv01442
Plaintiff:
Bryan Matthew Funk
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Party, Stacey Crabtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quintanilla v. Bryson et al
as 6:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Edgar Quintanilla
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, Robert Toole, Otis Stanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quintanilla v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, et al
as 1:2013cv00334
Plaintiff:
Allen Quintanilla
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and Christopher Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Quintanilla et al v. Mansfield Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Allen Quintanilla and Wayne Castle, Jr.
Defendant:
Mansfield Correctional Institution, Christopher Lynch and Institutional Inspector
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammett et al v. Emerald Correctional Management Inc.
as 1:2009cv00984
Plaintiff:
Robert Hammett, Petronilo Franco, Darrel Smith and others
Defendant:
Emerald Correctional Management Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quintanilla v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv00558
Plaintiff:
Hector Quintanilla
Defendant:
United States of America, Dan Marchant, Scott Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Quintanilla v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv00536
Plaintiff:
Hector Quintanilla
Defendant:
United States of America, Dan Marchant, Scott Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
