Cases 1 - 10 of 36
STACY v. TEMPLE et al
as 1:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RICHARD STACY
Defendant:
DYLAN TEMPLE, TEMPLE, SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. People of the States
as 3:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Jorge Diaz, Jose Diaz, Cristobal Diaz and others
Defendant:
People of the States, Hector Garcia, E. Kinones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARCIA v. READING POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2023cv04908
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO J. GARCIA, JR.
Defendant:
READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, RDG POLICE OFFICER CRISTIAN MOROR, RDG POLICE OFFICER MS. SUPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Read v. (lnu) (1) et al
as 5:2022cv03120
Plaintiff:
Johnathan C. Read
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu) (1), (fnu) (lnu) (2), (fnu) (lnu) (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reading v. Corizon Health Care Inc.
as 8:2020cv01310
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Reading
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. Read
as 3:2020cv50007
Defendant:
DeKalb County Sheriff, Read, Roger Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Roberto Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cadena v. Frisk, et al
as 3:2019cv02684
Plaintiff:
Victor Cadena
Defendant:
J. Frisk, D. Mitchen, C. Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNAKIN v. THE CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2018cv03370
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOHNAKIN
Defendant:
THE CITY OF READING, BERKS COUNTY, CHIEF DEPUTY WARDEN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reading v. Gaither
as 2:2018cv00363
Plaintiff:
Andy Reading
Defendant:
Layron J. Gaither
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wardlow et al v. Gonzalez et al
as 2:2018cv00294
Plaintiff:
Jadarius Wardlow, Jesus M. Cruz, Nelson Cantreras and others
Defendant:
Layron J. Gaither and Kathleen A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
