Cases 1 - 10 of 10
KAUFFMAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon Mayo v. Timothy Little, et al
as 22-1849
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANNON MAYO
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY LITTLE, HAVENS, OFFICER BARBOUR and others
MAYO v. ROGERS et al
as 3:2020cv00185
Defendant:
SERGEANT MCCLELLAND, CORRECTIONS OFFICER ROGERS and UNIT MANAGER TIMOTHY LITTLE
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MAYO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MAYO v. LITTLE et al
as 3:2018cv00125
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MAYO
Defendant:
TIMOTHY LITTLE, OFFICER HAVENS, OFFICER BARBOUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. LITTLE et al
as 3:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY LITTLE, BARRY SMITH, LT. KOVAC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELL v. LITTLE et al
as 3:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
ALEX BELL
Defendant:
TIMOTHY LITTLE, CAPTAIN ACEY, ANGEL STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. LITTLE et al
as 3:2014cv00266
Plaintiff:
KONATA MATTHEWS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY LITTLE, CHENCHARICK, SAWTELLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. LITTLE et al
as 3:2014cv00256
Plaintiff:
KONATA MATTHEWS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY LITTLE, DEFELICE, CHENCHARICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRITT v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2013cv00708
Defendant:
SHERIFF FRANK ANDERSON, WARDEN JEFF CONWAY, MR. DOE and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN W. PRITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KRESS et al v. CCA OF TENNESSEE, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00431
Plaintiff:
ALAN KRESS, BILLY FORD, ERIC STAGGS and others
Defendant:
CCA OF TENNESSEE, LLC doing business as CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF FRANK ANDERSON, VIRGINIA LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
