Cases 1 - 10 of 3,226
Cadwallader v. Karas et al
as 5:2024cv05107
Plaintiff:
David Cadwallader
Defendant:
John Karas, Nurse Kelly Hinely, Justyn McEntire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Balzan v. CCDOC et al
as 1:2024cv03720
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Reyes Balzan
Defendant:
CCDOC, Tom Dart and CCDOC Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Cooper et al
as 1:2024cv03549
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Bennett
Defendant:
Jerri Cooper, Marin Share, Dawn R. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus Henderson v. Gary Hamblin, et al
as 24-1757
Plaintiff:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant:
GARY HAMBLIN, TIM HAINES, Superintendent, RICHARD S. SCHNEITER and others
Gill v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03475
Plaintiff:
Henry B Gill, Jr.
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Sgt. Valadez, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dale v. Stephens et al
as 2:2024cv02053
Plaintiff:
Jason Dale
Defendant:
Former Sheriff Jimmy Stephens, Sheriff Tom Hughes, Jail Administrator Jacob Schook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tuck v. Cook County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv03251
Plaintiff:
William Tuck
Defendant:
Cook County Correctional Facility and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 5:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. COHEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, DA JOHN DOE, TOM HESS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 5:2024cv01731
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. COHEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, DA JANE DOE, MARLIN ZIMMERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hentz v. Valadez et al
as 1:2024cv02848
Plaintiff:
Hajuan Hentz
Defendant:
Sgt Valadez, Co Araiza, Co Harriss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
