Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Blakney v. United States of America
as 5:2023ct03228
Plaintiff:
Larry Blakney
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Hernandez
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
USA v. Karnail Singh
as 23-1474
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KARNAIL SINGH
El-Bey v. Butler County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jttonali One Eye El-Bey
Defendant:
Butler County Jail, Richard K. Jones, Sheriff, Robert Carpenter; 2675 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023ct03116
Plaintiff:
Harold Montgomery
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice, Genna D. Petre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Goodman v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023ct03117
Plaintiff:
Roy Goodman
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice, Genna D. Petre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mark Brown, Jr. v. USA
as 23-5158
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK EDMOND BROWN, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Roque et al v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv04355
Plaintiff:
Arlyn Roque and S.A.G.R.
Defendant:
OF AMERICA UNITED STATES and Loyal Source Government Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Andre Martin v. USA
as 22-3942
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDRE MARTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Duane Berry v. U.S. Attorney for Eastern District of Virginia
as 22-7296
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUANE LETROY BERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
