Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Spencer v. Scott County, Missouri et al
as 1:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Troy Lynn Spencer
Defendant:
Scott County, Missouri, William H. Winchester, III, Scott E Thomsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matherly et al v. Holder et al
as 5:2014ct03284
Plaintiff:
Thomas Shane Matherly and Daniel H. King
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Sylvia Matthews-Burwell, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker et al v. DesLauriers et al
as 6:2014cv01356
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Baker, David E. Benton, Sr., Richard L. Cochran and others
Defendant:
Austin DesLauriers, Sean Wagner, Tom Kinlen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniel King v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-7528
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL H. KING
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and CHARLES RATLEDGE
King v. Holder et al
as 5:2014ct03255
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. King
Defendant:
Eric Holder and Sylvia Matthews Burwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniel H. King v. Attorney General
as 14-7439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL H. KING
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, ERIC HOLDER, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
New v. Hankins et al
as 3:2014cv03287
Plaintiff:
John H New, Jr
Defendant:
Joseph P Hankins and Guy Groot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nji v. Talton Communications, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv06449
Plaintiff:
Njasang Nji
Defendant:
Talton Communications, Inc., Julius Talton, Jr., James Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle Cooke v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-6903
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDLE PORTER COOKE
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., CHARLES E. SAMUELS, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS and others
Maxwell v. Caskey et al
as 3:2014cv03080
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Maxwell
Defendant:
Herbert T Caskey, Shane Jumper, Robert Brucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
