Cases 121 - 130 of 831,391
Singh, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3858
Petitioner:
DAYA SINGH, KIRATPAL KAUR KAUR and RANJEET SINGH SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Fan v. City of Newport Beach, et al.
as 24-3866
Plaintiff:
YAXIAN FAN
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, in the City of Santa Ana and KEITH E RODEHUIS, KER is the owner of KER Legal Group
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Mahdi v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2024cv01092
Plaintiff:
Abuwi Mahdi
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Funk v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough)
as 8:2024cv01518
Petitioner:
Jason Matthew Funk
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WORTHINGTON et al v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE et al
as 2:2024cv02739
Plaintiff:
LOUIS WORTHINGTON and LINDA WORTHINGTON
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE, PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cavalier v. Aranda et al
as 3:2024cv03748
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Cavalier
Defendant:
A. Aranda, Pollard, Buckle Steadman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
(PC) Gaither v. Williams, et al.
as 1:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Burrell A. Gaither
Defendant:
S. Williams, A. George, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conaway v. Vanelswyk
as 8:2024cv01522
Plaintiff:
Jermaine R. Conaway
Defendant:
Brice Vanelswyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
