Cases 41 - 50 of 54
United States of America v. $30,000.00 et al
as 2:2012cv02289
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$30,000.00, Five Million Nine Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Thirty-One Dollars Thirty-Three Cents($5,988,031.33) in U.S. Funds, All Funds on Deposit and Credited to Eleven(11) Assorted Edward Jones Financial Accounts and others
Claimant:
Sylvia McAlpin , Wayne David McAlpin, Jr. , Budget Auto Sales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
United States v. Kristin L. Dougherty
as 12-1809
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Movant - Appellant:
Kristin L. Dougherty
Defendant:
Real Property located at Parcel No. 71-17A Estate Fish Bay, No. 8 Reef Bay Quarter, St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands, PWD No. D9-7414-T004, along with all its buildings, appurtenances, and improvements
United States of America v. Real Property located at Parcel No. 71-17A Estate Fish Bay, No. 8 Reef Bay Quarter, St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands, PWD No. D9-7414-T004, along with all its buildings, appurtenances, and improvements
as 4:2011cv00818
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property located at Parcel No. 71-17A Estate Fish Bay, No. 8 Reef Bay Quarter, St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands, PWD No. D9-7414-T004, along with all its buildings, appurtenances, and improvements
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. 1777 Old Camp Trail, NW Conyers, GA et al
as 1:2011cv01534
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
1777 Old Camp Trail, NW, Conyers, GA, 1766 Old Camp Trail, NW, Conyers, Georgia, 1700 Old Camp Trail, NW, Conyers, Georgia and others
Claimant:
Larry Simmons and All-Star Properties & Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONE (1) PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, KNOWN AS CABANA BAYAMESA et al
as 1:2011cv20802
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ONE (1) PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, KNOWN AS CABANA BAYAMESA, ONE PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC KNOWN AS PARCEL 95-A-4-D-1, ONE PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC KNOWN AS PARCEL 407 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF WYNDEN OAKS ESTATES IN HOUSTON
as 4:2010cv03518
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF WYNDEN OAKS ESTATES, AN ADDITION IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, ALSO KNOWN AS 5 WYNDEN OAKS DRIVE IN HOUSTON, TEXAS, AND ALL IMPORVEMENTS, BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, AND APPURTENANCES
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States Of America v. The Estate of Ben H. Novack, Jr.
as 7:2010cv05230
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
The Estate of Ben H. Novack, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
USA v. The Treasure Chest Trust, et al
as 10-55981
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
THE TREASURE CHEST TRUST and LEIGH-DAVIS GLASS
Defendant:
333,806.93 IN PROCEEDS FROM THE FORECLOSURE SALE OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 26948 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, MALIBU, CALIFORNIA
United States v. LOT NO. 9-1, TRACT NO. 19312, ORDOT-CHALAN PAGO, GUAM, ESTATE NO. 8819, SUBURBAN et al
as 1:2009cv00026
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
LOT NO. 9-1, TRACT NO. 19312, ORDOT-CHALAN PAGO, GUAM, ESTATE NO. 8819, SUBURBAN, LOT NO. 9-2, TRACT NO. 19312, ORDOT-CHALAN PAGO, GUAM, ESTATE NO. 8819, SUBURBAN, LOT NO. 9-3, TRACT NO. 19312, ORDOT-CHALAN PAGO, GUAM, ESTATE NO. 8819, SUBURBAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States of America v. One Helicopter et al
as 1:2009cv21429
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
One Helicopter, Thirty-Four Parcels of Real Estate in the Dominican Republic, Five Parcels of Real Estate in Miami-Dade County and Broward County, Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Property forfeiture from criminal acts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
