Cases 1 - 10 of 15
USA v. a. One (1) fashion ring in 14k yellow gold; et al
as 3:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
a. One (1) fashion ring in 14k yellow gold;, b. One (1) Eternity ring with 138 brilliant diamonds;, c. One (1) Rolex Yacht-Master model number 1662; and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. U.S Currency $25,760.00
as 2:2023cv13037
Plaintiff:
United States of America and U.S Currency $25,760.00; and 18K Rose Gold Rolex-Day Date 40, Model 218235 Watch,
Defendant:
U.S Currency $25,760.00 and 18K Rose Gold Rolex-Day Date 40, Model 218235 Watch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. 1.One Genuine Mens Rolex Watch, Submariner Style, 41MM, Sapphire Crystal, Blue Ceramic Bezel Blue Dial, Serial No. 386U64F7 et al
as 3:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
1). ONE GENUINE MENS ROLEX WATCH, SUBMARINER STYLE, 41MM, SAPPHIRE CRYSTAL, BLUE CERAMIC BEZEL BLUE DIAL, SERIAL NO. 386U64F7;, [2] ONE GENUINE MENS ROLEX WATCH, SUBMARINER STYLE, 41MM, STAINLESS STEEL & 18K YELLOW GOLD, SERIAL NO. 42DM7808;, [3] ONE GENUINE MENS ROLEX WATCH, SUBMARINER STYLE, 41MM, SAPPHIRE CRYSTAL, BLACK DIAL W/CERAMIC BLACK BEZEL, SERIAL NO. 554825R6; and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. Genuine Rolex 18k Solid Rose Gold Watch, GMT Master II Design et al
as 3:2022cv01223
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
GENUINE ROLEX 18K SOLID ROSE GOLD WATCH, GMT MASTER II DESIGN WITH SOLID ROSE GOLD OYSTER BRACELET REF. 126715. GOLD CONDITION., GENUINE ROLEX MEN'S18K YACHTMASTER II ALL YELLOW GOLD WATCH, WHITE DIAL, CERAMIC BLUE BEZEL OYSTER BRACELET, WITH DOUBLE CLASP. MODEL NUMBER# 116688, SERIAL NUMBER H44V7303 INCLUDES ORIGINAL, GENUINE ROLEX 18K SOLID ROSE GOLD AND STAINLESSSTEEL WATCH, YACHTMASTER II DESIGN REF. 116681, SERIAL NUMBER# 5538L503, WHITE DIAL WITH BLUE COLORED CERAMIC BEZEL, INCLUDING WARRANTY CARD, ORIGIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. 967 NW 2nd Street, Prineville, OR 97754 & Pace's First Addition Lot 11, Block 0 et al
as 6:2021cv01756
Counter Defendant:
USA
Defendant:
967 NW 2nd Street, Prineville, OR 97754 & Paces First Addition Lot 11, Block 0, 280 NE 4th Street, Prineville, OR 97754, 24121 SE Paulina Highway, Prineville, OR 97754 and others
Claimant:
Darla Byus, Rodney Pierson, Jonne Pierson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2021cv11829
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) U.S. Currency, Seventy-Seven Thousand One Hundred Fifty-Two Dollars ($77,152.00) U.S. Currency, Eight Thousand Two Hundred Ten Dollars ($8,210.00) U.S. Currency and others
Claimant:
Jermaine Lett and Adrian Tabares-Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. Personal Propoerty Ladies Gold Oyster Perpetual Rolex Watch SN: P150357 et al
as 2:2016cv14381
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Personal Property Ladies Gold Oyster Perpetual Rolex Watch SN: P150357, Personal Property Religious Charm, Personal Property Men's Kind Knot Style Neck Chain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States of America v. Assets Described in "Attachment A" to the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem
as 6:2009cv01852
Claimant:
First Security Bank & Trust Company, Raul Rojer, Skyview Construction, LLC and others
Defendant:
Assets Described in "Attachment A" to the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983
United States of America v. Butcher
as 5:2015cv00184
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Butcher
Garnishee:
Day Scarafile & Read Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205
United States of America v. Dai
as 3:2013cv00219
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jie Dai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
