Cases 31 - 40 of 167
Soptic et al v. Southwestern Bell Telephone L.P. et al
as 4:2020cv00302
Defendant:
Southwestern Bell Telephone L.P., AT&T Services, Inc. and AT
Plaintiff:
Jessica Mota, Ryan Caddell, Heather Fitzpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Boyle v. Wayne Peterson Enterprises et al
as 4:2020cv00101
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Boyle
Defendant:
Wayne Peterson Enterprises and Wayne Peterson
Peterson v. Heartland Express Services, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01142
Plaintiff:
Danielle Peterson
Defendant:
Heartland Express Services, Inc.
Peterson v. Navajo, County of
as 3:2020cv08055
Plaintiff:
Thomas Scott Peterson
Defendant:
Navajo, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peterson v. Sunrise Homes Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv00273
Defendant:
SUNRISE HOMES INC, SUNRISE HOMES REALTY INC, Sunrise Homes Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
NICOLE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Peterson et al v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
as 1:2019cv04457
Defendant:
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
Plaintiff:
Adrian Peterson and Schoen Green
PETERSON v. PREMIER PLUMBING AND LEAK, LLC
as 1:2019cv00187
Plaintiff:
AVERY PETERSON
Defendant:
PREMIER PLUMBING AND LEAK, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Bliss v. Ducky Johnson Home Elevation, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00353
Defendant:
Gregory Peterson, Charlie Johnson, Ducky Johnson Home Elevation, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Bliss
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Peterson v. Moody's Analytics, Inc.
as 1:2018cv09944
Plaintiff:
Richard Peterson
Defendant:
Moody's Analytics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Valerio-Naranjo et al v. Shady Ridge Corp. et al
as 7:2018cv00175
Defendant:
Jeffrey C. Lee Farms, Inc., Bernardo Perez, Shady Ridge Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Sabino Valerio-Naranjo, Julio Abraham Rivera-Balderas, Alejandro Martinez-Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
