Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Green v. Brown
as 2:2023cv08532
Plaintiff:
Annalee Green
Defendant:
William M Brown and William M. Brown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Brown v. Superior Management, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03833
Plaintiff:
Henry M. Brown
Defendant:
Superior Management, Inc.
Blom et al v. City of Gadsden Alabama
as 4:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Blom, Austin T Abernathy, Joseph C Bailey and others
Defendant:
City of Gadsden Alabama
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
ROSENBERG et al v. BIOREFERENCE LABORATORIES, INC.
as 3:2022cv02321
Plaintiff:
LAURENCE ROSENBERG and KELLY M BROWN
Defendant:
BIOREFERENCE LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ROSENBERG et al v. BIOREFERENCE LABORATORIES, INC.
as 2:2022cv02321
Plaintiff:
LAURENCE ROSENBERG and KELLY M BROWN
Defendant:
BIOREFERENCE LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BROWNE v. CIRCLE K STORES INC.
as 3:2021cv00663
Plaintiff:
ANNE M. BROWNE
Defendant:
CIRCLE K STORES INC.
BROWN v. MJH HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv13283
Defendant:
ROBERT GOLDSMITH, MJH ASSOCIATES, INC., MICHAEL J. HENNESSY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH M. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Brown et al v. Infinity Medical Park Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01247
Plaintiff:
Ray Brown and April M. Brown
Defendant:
Infinity Medical Park Inc., Shreya C. Shah, Hiren Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Martignetti et al v. City of Cambridge
as 1:2018cv10980
Plaintiff:
Victor A. Martignetti , David G. Albert , Keith Albert and others
Defendant:
City of Cambridge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Kozusko et al v Tire Discounters, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00086
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Kozusko , David Johnson , Scott A. Mustovich and others
Defendant:
Tire Discounters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
