Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Stacey v. Miller Tubular Services, LLC et al
as 7:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Chase Stacey
Defendant:
Miller Tubular Services, LLC and Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Acosta v. Machinery Equipment Rebuilder Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07539
Plaintiff:
Edwin Oswaldo Marin Acosta
Defendant:
Machinery Equipment Rebuilder Inc. and Paul Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Parks et al v. Cowabunga, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00138
Defendant:
Cowabunga, Inc. and Cowabunga, Inc. doing business as Domino's Pizza, a Georgia Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller, Lashaun Parks and Bradley Woodard
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
MILLER v. MILLER et al
as 3:2019cv00204
Defendant:
P.C. QUEST, INC. and MARK A. MILLER
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MILLER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith v. Invisible Waste Services LLC et al
as 0:2018cv62571
Defendant:
VALET LIVING, LLC, Michael Miller and INVISIBLE WASTE SERVICE LLC
Plaintiff:
David Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Cordova et al v. Miller et al
as 1:2017cv04328
Plaintiff:
Maria Avizures, Blanca Cordova, Marlene Hernandez and others
Defendant:
Adam Miller, Michael Miller and Miller 18 LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
McManus et al v. City of Ceres, California
as 1:2017cv00355
Plaintiff:
Jonathan McManus , Tyler Born , Alex Craig and others
Defendant:
City of Ceres, California
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Miller v. Orlando Health, Inc.
as 6:2016cv00724
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller
Defendant:
Orlando Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Miller v. Buddyz McHenry, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv50151
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller
Defendant:
Buddyz McHenry, Inc. and John Beuckens
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bosquez v. Angel's Bail Bonds, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00972
Plaintiff:
Anyeli Bosquez
Defendant:
Angel's Bail Bonds, Inc. and Angel Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
