Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Robinson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 8:2020cv01680
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Wyman v. Tennessee Department of Correction
as 3:2020cv00462
Plaintiff:
Emily Wyman
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Fulton et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv00144
Defendant:
New York City Department of Correction and City of New York
Plaintiff:
Katrina Fulton and Darnell Walcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
ELLIS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2019cv00145
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
Nicole P. Ellis and NICOLE P ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2617
LAWSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2018cv00437
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
Lynette Lawson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Thurman et al v. Missouri Department of Corrections
as 2:2018cv04005
Plaintiff:
Vicki Thurman and David Thurman
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Dejon White v. State of California, et al
as 17-17143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEJON D. WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, (California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation), BRENT L. WARREN, L.M. PENNISI, Jr. and others
Bonini v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 8:2017cv00164
Plaintiff:
Lurie Bonini
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Cozad v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv04131
Plaintiff:
Stacey Cozad
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, John R Baldwin and Stephanie Dorethy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Newman v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2015cv14422
Plaintiff:
Shelby Newman
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
