Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Julian Hood, Jr. v. USPS
as 17-1049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Grourke v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Khskhm Grourke
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 3:2016cv06474
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMAL HARRIS, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Revennaugh et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2016cv00783
Plaintiff:
Vicki Revennaugh and Stephanie Barnhouse
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and Megan J Brennan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Payton v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2016cv02794
Defendant:
National Association of Letter Carriers and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Robert Payton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Simpson v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2016cv04925
Plaintiff:
Joseph Simpson
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Chase v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 16-1351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CHASE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MICHEAL KING and UNITED STATES, as sole defendant on Counts III, IV, and V.
Schmidt v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2016cv00621
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Schmidt
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Jones v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2015cv03621
Plaintiff:
Steve Jones
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hood v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2015cv00434
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Hood, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
