Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Balani v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 3:2024cv01509
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Sabeeta Balani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crawford v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 3:2024cv01560
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Crawford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Henton v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al.
as 1:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Danielle Henton
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC, Crystal D. Murphy and Michael Peeples
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
DIAZ v. AMAZON, INC.
as 3:2024cv04883
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Diaz
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES INC and AMAZON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Keytack v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 2:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Joseph Keytack
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Spivey v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Katrina Roberson Spivey
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Yohn v. Amazon.com Service, LLC
as 1:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Yohn
Defendant:
Amazon.com Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Bickerstaff v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Bickerstaff
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc and Amazon Logistics Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
MANGAR et al v. AMAZON.COM, SERVICES, LLC
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
MALYSHA MANGAR and CHASELYNN BENAVIDES
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
MANGAR et al v. AMAZON.COM, SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
MALYSHA MANGAR and CHASELYNN BENAVIDES
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
