Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Henton v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al.
as 1:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Danielle Henton
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC, Crystal D. Murphy and Michael Peeples
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Keytack v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 2:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Joseph Keytack
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Spivey v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Katrina Roberson Spivey
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Yohn v. Amazon.com Service, LLC
as 1:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Yohn
Defendant:
Amazon.com Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
MANGAR et al v. AMAZON.COM, SERVICES, LLC
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
MALYSHA MANGAR and CHASELYNN BENAVIDES
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
MANGAR et al v. AMAZON.COM, SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
MALYSHA MANGAR and CHASELYNN BENAVIDES
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Chapman-Pinto v. Amazon.Com Services LLC
as 2:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
Katie Chapman-Pinto
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services, LLC
Torres v. Amazon.Com Services LLC
as 8:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
Dayanara J. Torres
Defendant:
Amazon.Com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
ORFI v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01698
Plaintiff:
JAQUAD ORFI and JAOUAD ORFI
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC, JOHN DOES #1-10 (FICTITIOUS NAMES), ABC COMPANIES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Acevedo v. Amazon.com Services, LLC
as 3:2022cv01155
Plaintiff:
Sandra Acevedo
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 Family & Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
