Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Parsons v. Graham Lumber Company, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
Chris Parsons
Defendant:
Graham Lumber Company, LLC and American Hardwood Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
Quaglieri v. Athleta LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Quaglieri
Defendant:
Athleta LLC, Dawn Graham and Morgan Grimes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Graham v. City of Fredericksburg, VA
as 3:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Markus Graham
Defendant:
City of Fredericksburg, VA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Family Medical Leave Act
Graham v. Ranch Innovetive VSO, LLC
as 8:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Paige Graham
Defendant:
Ranch Innovetive VSO, LLC doing business as Animal Hospital at Lakewood Ranch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
GRAHAM v. LAKE PARK OPERATIONS LLC
as 4:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
Denise Graham
Defendant:
Lake Park Operations, LLC and LAKE PARK OPERATIONS LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Torres-Graham v. Wireless Vision Holdings, LLC
as 3:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jessica A. Torres-Graham
Defendant:
Wireless Vision Holdings, LLC and Wireless Vision, LLC d/b/a WVTX Vision, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
Graham v. El Paso County
as 3:2021cv00066
Plaintiff:
MAGDA E. GRAHAM
Defendant:
El Paso County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
GRAHAM v. TRIUMPH AEROSTRUCTURES, LLC
as 2:2020cv14241
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW GRAHAM
Defendant:
TRIUMPH AEROSTRUCTURES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
GRAHAM v. TRIUMPH AEROSTRUCTURES, LLC
as 2:2020cv14240
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW GRAHAM
Defendant:
TRIUMPH AEROSTRUCTURES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Graham v. Fanatics, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01358
Defendant:
FANATICS, INC.
Plaintiff:
MELANIE GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
