Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Erick Lina v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00281
Defendant:
Barnes & Noble, Inc, Barnes & Noble, Inc., Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Erick Lina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Carag v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. et al.,
as 2:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Carag
Defendant:
Barnes & Noble, Inc. and Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirby Barnes v. Smithfield Food
as 14-1670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRBY BARNES
Defendant - Appellee:
SMITHFIELD FOODS
Barnes v. Smithfield Foods
as 2:2014cv00080
Plaintiff:
Kirby Barnes
Defendant:
Smithfield Foods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Favaloro v. BJC Healthcare et al
as 4:2014cv00284
Plaintiff:
Sally K. Favaloro
Defendant:
BJC Healthcare, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Rhonda Brandon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Carag v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00481
Defendant:
Barnes & Noble, Inc. and Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Carag
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carag v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. et al
as 2:2014at00197
Defendant:
Barnes & Noble, Inc. , Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc. and DOES 1 through 100
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Carag
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benjamin Hook v. Asset Management Specialists Inc et al
as 5:2014cv00260
Defendant:
Asset Management Specialists Inc, David Barns and Does
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Hook
Alexis Plaisted v. Dress Barn, Inc.
as 13-55316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXIS PLAISTED, an individual; on behalf of herself, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
DRESS BARN, INC.
Barnes v. Spirit Aerosystems, et al
as 13-3043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR BARNES
Defendant - Appellee:
SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
BYRON WHEELER, 1st Shift Manager, NANCY GOSSETT, HR Rep, JEFFREY TURNER, CEO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
