Cases 71 - 80 of 289
Figueroa-Ibarry v. Rennick et al
as 1:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Kevin B. Rennick and Mark T. Esper
Plaintiff:
Cinthia H. Figueroa-Ibarry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plumbers and Steamfitters Union Local No. 10 v. Waters
as 3:2020cv00003
Defendant:
Stuart Waters
Plaintiff:
Plumbers and Steamfitters Union Local No. 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01556
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
St. Clair v. Carilion Medical Center et al
as 7:2019cv00828
Plaintiff:
Beth R. St. Clair
Defendant:
Carilion Clinic and Carilion Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Schack v. Parallon Enterprises, LLC et al
as 7:2019cv00767
Defendant:
Parallon Enterprises, LLC, Lewis-Gale Hospital, Incorporated and HCA-The Healthcare Company
Plaintiff:
Clara Schack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Mobley v. Premier Fixtures, LLC
as 3:2019cv00756
Defendant:
Premier Fixtures, LLC
Plaintiff:
Tyniqua Mobley
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Hoover v. Stonemor Partners, LP et al
as 3:2019cv00751
Plaintiff:
Angela L. Hoover
Defendant:
Stonemor Partners, LP and Gina Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Piron et al v. General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00709
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Merino, Mollie Piron and Bounsou Thamvanthongkham
Defendant:
General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Wagoner v. Cranberry Hearing and Balance Center, LLC d/b/a Cosmetic Hearing Solutions et al
as 1:2019cv01047
Defendant:
Mark L. Gustina and Cranberry Hearing and Balance Center, LLC d/b/a Cosmetic Hearing Solutions
Plaintiff:
Julie Wagoner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burke v. Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority
as 2:2019cv00398
Defendant:
Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority
Plaintiff:
Anthony Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.