Cases 1 - 10 of 163
Hill v. Optum Labs, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kelly McCay Hill
Defendant:
Optum Labs, LLC and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kelly v. Banner Health et al
as 2:2024at00358
Plaintiff:
Vincent Kelly
Defendant:
Banner Health and BH Corporate Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Kelly v. Banner Health et al
as 2:2024cv00920
Plaintiff:
Vincent Kelly
Defendant:
Banner Health and BH Corporate Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Bonetti v. TriStruX LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01319
Plaintiff:
Tyler Andrew Bonetti
Defendant:
TriStruX LLC, James Cortez and John Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Kelly v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Kelly
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kelly v. CCS Enterprises, LLC
as 9:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Michael Kelly
Defendant:
CCS Enterprises, LLC d/b/a United Locating Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Pitpit v. Teamsters Local 150 et al
as 2:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Kelli Pitpit
Defendant:
Teamsters Local 150 and Dale Wentz
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Pitpit v. Teamsters Local 150 et al
as 2:2024at00098
Plaintiff:
Kelli Pitpit
Defendant:
Teamsters Local 150 and Mr. Dale Wentz
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
MORRIS v. Kelly-Moore Paint Company Inc et al
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL MORRIS
Defendant:
Kelly-Moore Paint Company Inc, FLACKSGROUP, LLC and Flacksgroup LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 Exclusions from Definition of Loss of Employment
Kelly v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
James Kelly
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency and Jason Maxedon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Other Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
