Cases 11 - 20 of 89
Grimm v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., et al
as 2:2020cv01490
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Lance Grimm
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Robinson v. AT&T Services Inc et al
as 2:2020cv01027
Defendant:
AT&T Inc and AT&T Services Inc
Plaintiff:
Roy Thomas Robinson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Melody Harrell v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2019cv09296
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, AT&T, Inc. Group Insurance Plan and AT and T, Inc. Group Insurance Plan
Plaintiff:
Melody Harrell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Eliason et al v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv06232
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Inc. and AT&T Pension Benefit Plan
Plaintiff:
Lindie Lawrence, Amy Eliason and Angela Hueckel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
(PS)Loftus v. AT&T, Inc.
as 2:2018cv02866
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Loftus, Jr.
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ryan v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00315
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Benefits Center, AT&T Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Ryan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Seimer v. AT&T, Inc. et al.
as 3:2018cv50200
Plaintiff:
Jeff Seimer
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and Fidelity Investments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Hafiz v. AT&T Inc et al
as 3:2017cv03092
Plaintiff:
Khalid Hafiz
Defendant:
AT&T Inc and AT&T Pension Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Julio C. Alas v. AT and T, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv08106
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., AT and T Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alas Julio, Julio C. Alas, Robert J Bugielski and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Hale et al v. DIRECTV Customer Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02883
Plaintiff:
Lloyd D. Hale and Marilyn Marie Hale
Defendant:
DIRECTV Customer Services, Inc. , DIRECTV, LLC , AT&T, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
