Cases 71 - 80 of 119
Fredendall v. Ford Motor Company UAW Retirement Plan et al
as 2:2010cv10410
Plaintiff:
Duane M Fredendall
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company UAW Retirement Plan and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
FLEISCHMANN v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv00159
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FLEISCHMANN
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY and FORD GENERAL RETIREMENT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Steven M. Goble et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2011cv10412
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Goble and Virginia Johnson Goble
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Unicare Life and Health Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Korte v. Ford Motor Company, Incorporated et al
as 2:2010cv10475
Plaintiff:
Kelly Korte
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Incorporated, Stephen O'Neill and Richard Popp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Helen Meluch, Administratix to the Estate of William Meluch v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2010cv00651
Defendant:
Danielle M. Edwards, John Does 1 through 5, Unicare and others
Plaintiff:
Helen Meluch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Turner v. Ford Motor Company UAW Retirement Plan et al
as 3:2010cv00221
Plaintiff:
Eugene N. Turner
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company UAW Retirement Plan, Hilda Solis, Timothy Geithner and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Ford Motor Company v. Kimberly A. Gilboe, et al
as 2:2009cv14872
Plaintiff:
Ford Motor Company
Defendant:
Kimberly A. Gilboe and John Gilboe
Zlotucha v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2009cv01082
Plaintiff:
Virginia Zlotucha
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Ford Medical Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Schulte et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2008cv00758
Plaintiff:
John Schulte and Kim Schulte
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
