Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Armstrong, et al v. Global Pacific Records, Inc., et al
as 1:2008cv10228
Plaintiff:
Randy Armstrong, Randy Armstrong, Volker Nahrmann and others
Defendant:
Global Pacific Records, Inc., Digital Music Group, Inc. and Howard L. Sapper
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Proxibid v. BigGavel.com et al
as 8:2007cv00396
Plaintiff:
Proxibid, Proxibid and Proxibid
Defendant:
BigGavel.com, Alan Armstrong, Dorothy Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
International Computer Consulting Corporation, Inc. v. Family Credit Counseling Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv61224
Plaintiff:
International Computer Consulting Corporation, Inc.
Defendant:
Family Credit Counseling Corporation, James R. Armstrong, Jr. and Phil Garner
Counter Claimant:
Family Credit Counseling Corporation
Counter Defendant:
International Computer Consulting Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
W.D. Armstrong Corporation v. Johnson
as 6:2007cv01241
Plaintiff:
W.D. Armstrong Corporation, W.D. Armstrong Corporation and W.D. Armstrong Corporation
Defendant:
Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. et al v. Armstrong
as 5:2007cv00056
Plaintiff:
Elektra Entertainment Group Inc., Atlantic Recording Corporation, Arista Records LLC and others
Defendant:
Ishmael R. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
W.D. Armstrong Corp v. Lamb et al
as 2:2007cv00010
Plaintiff:
W.D. Armstrong Corp
Defendant:
Grant Lamb, Carol Lamb and Lamb's Super Appliance World, Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Armstrong
as 1:2007cv00017
Plaintiff:
UMG Recordings, Inc., Arista Records LLC, Motown Record Company, L. P. and others
Defendant:
Karah Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
