Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Raman Singh v. Gary Ha
as 10-1744
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RAMAN K. SINGH
Defendant - Appellant:
GARY HASS, a/k/a Gary Van Hass, a/k/a Gary Hollywood
Pearson Education, Inc. v. Kumar
as 10-2610
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Pearson Education, Inc., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Cengage Learning Inc. and others
Defendant:
Virender Yadav, Sukwinder Singh, DBA Modern Books, DBA Express Books and John Does 1-5
Defendant - Appellant:
Vinod Kumar and Dart Air, Inc., DBA Unique Books, DBA Jhon Book Store, DBA Modern Books, DBA Expressbooks06, DBA Express Books, DBA Qualityinstruments400
Pitbull Productions, Inc. v. B.B. Bookstore et al
as 1:2010cv02159
Plaintiff:
Pitbull Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
B.B. Bookstore, Jasbir Singh and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
LAW SCHOOL ADMISSION COUNCIL, INC. v. ROBIN SINGH EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv04050
Plaintiff:
LAW SCHOOL ADMISSION COUNCIL, INC.
Defendant:
ROBIN SINGH EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. and ROBIN SINGH
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Singh v. Haas
as 3:2009cv00386
Plaintiff:
Raman K. Singh
Defendant:
Gary Haas
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Cyber Sea Inc v. Netsmartz LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00587
Plaintiff:
Cyber Sea Inc and Cyber Sea Inc
Defendant:
Netsmartz LLC, Sebiz Infotech Pvt Ltd, Manjeet Dhariwal and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Singh v. Haas
as 3:2009cv00107
Plaintiff:
Raman K. Singh
Defendant:
Gary Haas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Yash Raj Films (USA) Inc. v. Sidhu et al
as 1:2009at00095
Plaintiff:
Yash Raj Films (USA) Inc.
Defendant:
Daljit Singh Sidhu and Does 1 to 25
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Yash Raj Films (USA) Inc. v. Sidhu et al
as 1:2009cv00233
Plaintiff:
Yash Raj Films (USA) Inc.
Defendant:
Daljit Singh Sidhu
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
