Cases 41 - 50 of 116
American Stitch, LLC v. Anonymous Jeans LLC
as 1:2017cv03289
Plaintiff:
American Stitch, LLC
Defendant:
Anonymous Jeans LLC and Ryan Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Batiste v. Lewis et al
as 2:2017cv04435
Defendant:
Ryan Lewis, Ben Haggerty, Macklemore Publishing and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Batiste
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
LHF Productions Inc v. Doe 1, et al
as 17-35252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LHF PRODUCTIONS INC
Defendant:
DOE 1
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD ACOSTA, agent of Doe 1, NATHANIEL LEWIS, agent of Doe 5, TRACY SILVAN, agent of Doe 10 and others
Michael Bradley Johnson v. Marquis Lewis, et al
as 2:2017cv01877
Plaintiff:
Johnson and Michael Bradley Johnson
Defendant:
Lewis (p/k/a RETNA), Marquis Lewis, Iron Eye Art Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Monterey Bay-Charlotte, LLC et al v. Lewis et al
as 3:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
Monterey Bay-Charlotte, LLC and Arthur Rutenberg Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
Matthew Lewis, Angela Lewis, Plattner Custom Builders, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oppenheimer et al v. Her Campus Media, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv12584
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer and Performance Impressions, LLC
Defendant:
Her Campus Media, LLC and Stephanie Kaplan Lewis
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Lewis v. Carty et al
as 3:2016cv00189
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Lewis
Defendant:
Carolyn Carty, Margarett Fishback Powers and Basil Zangere
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Michael Haverland Architects, P.C. v. Richard H. Lewis Architect
as 1:2016cv02142
Plaintiff:
Michael Haverland Architects, P.C.
Defendant:
Richard H. Lewis Architect
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Serendip LLC v. Bond
as 1:2016cv01727
Plaintiff:
Serendip LLC
Defendant:
Lewis Bond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
E TV Networks Inc v. Google Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00874
Defendant:
Marvin I Allen, Achouri Mohamed Amine, Mike Boane and others
Plaintiff:
E TV Networks Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
