Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Phat Cat Global et al v. CloudFlare, Inc.
as 3:2024cv03404
Plaintiff:
Phat Cat Global, Dreamroom Productions, Inc. and Lonewolf Gray, Inc.
Defendant:
CloudFlare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
TIR Consulting LLC v. CloudFlare, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv09010
Plaintiff:
TIR Consulting LLC
Defendant:
CloudFlare, Inc. and Namesilo LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Pierson v. GoLocalProv, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Kristen Pierson
Defendant:
GoLocalProv, LLC, The Fenton Group, LLC and Cloudflare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Mon Cheri Bridals, LLC, et al v. CloudFlare, Inc.
as 21-17118
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MON CHERI BRIDALS, LLC and MAGGIE SOTTERO DESIGNS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CLOUDFLARE, INC., a Delaware corporation
American Clothing Express, Inc. et al v. CloudFlare, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02007
Plaintiff:
American Clothing Express, Inc. and Justin Alexander, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-200 and CloudFlare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Mon Cheri Bridals, LLC et al v. Cloudflare, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01356
Plaintiff:
Maggie Sottero Designs, LLC and Mon Cheri Bridals, LLC
Defendant:
1-50 Does and CloudFlare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Mon Cheri Bridals, LLC et al v. Cloudflare, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv09453
Plaintiff:
Maggie Sottero Designs, LLC and Mon Cheri Bridals, LLC
Defendant:
Cloudflare, Inc. and Does 1-10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
Christopher Boffoli and CloudFlare Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Boffoli v. CloudFlare, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00163
Plaintiff:
Christopher Boffoli
Defendant:
CloudFlare Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
ALS Scan, Inc. v. Cloudflare, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05051
Plaintiff:
ALS Scan, Inc.
Defendant:
Cloudflare, Inc., DOES, Tiger Media, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
