Cases 41 - 50 of 168
JUUL LABS, INC. v. KEEP KEEP VAPORT ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.. et al
as 2:2018cv14607
Defendant:
KEEP VAPOR ELECTRONIC TECH. CO., LTD., KING DISTRIBUTION LLC and KEEP VAPORT ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.,
Plaintiff:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
JUUL LABS, INC. v. KEEP VAPOR ELECTRONIC TECH. CO., LTD. et al
as 3:2018cv14607
Defendant:
KEEP VAPOR ELECTRONIC TECH. CO., LTD. and KING DISTRIBUTION LLC
Plaintiff:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Stephens v. Ziegmann et al
as 0:2018cv01759
Plaintiff:
Carlis G. Stephens
Defendant:
Neil P. Ziegmann, N.P.Z., Inc., Orscheln Farm and Home, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Thermo King Corporation v. Rigmaster Power International Ltd.
as 0:2018cv01553
Plaintiff:
Thermo King Corporation
Defendant:
Rigmaster Power International Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Fecon, Inc. v. King Kong Tools, LLC
as 1:2018cv01843
Plaintiff:
Fecon, Inc.
Defendant:
King Kong Tools, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
United General Supply v. Rural King Administration Inc et al
as 2:2018cv02004
Plaintiff:
United General Supply Co Inc
Defendant:
Rural King Holding Co , Rural King Administration Inc , RK Holdings LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Voit Technologies, LLC v. Golf Cart King, LLC
as 1:2017cv01181
Defendant:
Golf Cart King, LLC
Plaintiff:
Voit Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Map Mobile, LLC v. Burger King Corporation
as 2:2017cv00774
Plaintiff:
Map Mobile, LLC
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Z. Sasson v. Beard King Corp.
as 1:2017cv24445
Plaintiff:
Z. Sasson
Defendant:
Beard King Corp
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. v. King Technology of Missouri, Inc.
as 4:2017cv02273
Plaintiff:
Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.
Defendant:
King Technology of Missouri, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
