Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv00465
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", brenda smith, Frederick Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. and Richard Payne
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv02570
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. , Oakley, Inc. , Yiyi Zhang and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" , Li Chen, Shenzhen Sailvan Network Technology Co. Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
TSDC, LLC v. Antoinette Galvan et al
as 1:2014cv02699
Plaintiff:
TSDC, LLC
Defendant:
Antoinette Galvan and Gloria Galvan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Silogram Lubricants Corp. v. Jospey et al
as 1:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
Silogram Lubricants Corp.
Defendant:
Stevan Jospey , Luis Lebron , Encore Petroleum, L.L.C. and others
Cross_claimant:
Advantage Environmental
Cross_defendant:
Gregory Bass, Ginger Berens, William Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Imagine Medispa, LLC et al v. Transformations, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv26923
Plaintiff:
Imagine Medispa, LLC and David A. Rubio
Defendant:
Transformations, Inc. , Liza Antoinette Frederick and Joshua P. Galbraith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
REYNOLDS INNOVATIONS, INC. v. BLOOG, LLC, et al
as 1:2011cv00885
Plaintiff:
REYNOLDS INNOVATIONS, INC.
Defendant:
BLOOG, LLC, WARREN VOGEL, ANTOINETTE LANZA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DesignArc LA Inc et al v. DesignArc International et al
as 2:2011cv05056
Plaintiff:
DesignArc Inc and DesignArc LA Inc
Defendant:
DesignArc International, Does and Antoinette Galisky
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
