Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Woldanski v. TuSimple Holdings, Inc. et al.
as 3:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Patrick Woldanski
Defendant:
TuSimple Holdings, Inc., Cheng Lu, Patrick Dillon and others
Petitioner:
George Maurizi, Guy Donald Foulkes, Ronald Betsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Woldanski v. TuSimple Holdings, Inc. et al.
as 1:2022cv09625
Plaintiff:
PATRICK WOLDANSKI
Defendant:
TUSIMPLE HOLDINGS, INC., CHENG LU, PATRICK DILLON and others
Petitioner:
George Maurizi, Guy Donald Foulkes, Ronald Betsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Newton v. Skillsoft Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv01383
Plaintiff:
Wanda Newton
Defendant:
Skillsoft Corp., Pat Kolek, Jeff Tarr and others
PRATER v. AMERICAN HERITAGE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 2:2018cv05515
Defendant:
JANE DOE, MATTHEW JAMES, JOH DOE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
Berg v. Panera Bread Co. et al
as 4:2017cv01631
Plaintiff:
Robert Berg
Defendant:
Panera Bread Co., Ronald Shaich, William W. Moreton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Scott and Gina Rudy Living Trust Dated March 18, 2011 v. Panera Bread Company et al
as 4:2017cv01627
Plaintiff:
Scott and Gina Rudy Living Trust Dated March 18, 2011
Defendant:
Panera Bread Company, Ronald Shaich, William W. Moreton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Phillips v. Panera Bread Company et al
as 1:2017cv00697
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Phillips
Defendant:
Panera Bread Company , Ronald M. Shaich , William W. Moreton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Remorenko v. Panera Bread Co. et al
as 4:2017cv01610
Plaintiff:
John Remorenko
Defendant:
Panera Bread Co., William W. Moreton, Domenic Colasacco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frohman v. Bousbib et al
as 1:2015cv03650
Plaintiff:
Cora Frohman
Defendant:
Ari Bousbib , Gregory D. Brenneman , J. Frank Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
