Cases 1 - 10 of 158,524
Benson et al
as 2:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Charlene Ann Benson and Sam Edward Benson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Rockwood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Justin Rockwood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Meyers v. Commissioner of SSA
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Stanley Keith Meyers
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Heather Ranee Carr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Conness v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Matthew Russell Conness
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Heth v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01597
Plaintiff:
Madison L Heth
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
O'Dell v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Diana O'Dell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Francis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv03148
Plaintiff:
Christopher Francis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Permenter v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Barbara Jean Permenter
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vocke v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
Nicole J Vocke
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
