Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Roux v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv01856
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Roux
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
NICKENS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY et al
as 2:2014cv04669
Plaintiff:
LISA ECILA NICKENS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and JOHN J. HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MERCER v. ASTRUE et al
as 1:2012cv01024
Plaintiff:
KAY MERCER
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ROY COOPER and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mercer v. Astrue et al
as 5:2012cv00552
Plaintiff:
Kay Mercer
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Roy Cooper and Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 4:2011cv10104
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security , Wifredo A. Ferrer and Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
SILVER v. Astrue et al
as 0:2011cv61842
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue , Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Wilfredo Ferrer
Plaintiff:
MARCY LYNNE SILVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
Cunningham v. Astrue et al
as 1:2010cv01217
Plaintiff:
Laquisha Cunningham
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Edward L. Stanton, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Turner v. Astrue et al
as 1:2009cv01185
Plaintiff:
Thelma Turner
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Lawrence J. Laurenzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thomas v. Astrue et al
as 1:2009cv01184
Plaintiff:
Raymond Thomas
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Lawrence J. Laurenzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Damesworth v. Astrue et al
as 1:2009cv01156
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Damesworth
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Lawrence J. Laurenzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
