Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv01626
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Marie Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robinson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00531
Plaintiff:
Tracy Marie Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robinson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Cristal Marie Robinson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ROBINSON v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv05032
Defendant:
Commissioner ANDREW M. SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
TENNILLE MARIE ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robinson v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv00622
Plaintiff:
Shamika Marie Robinson
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Robinson-Foor v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv05838
Plaintiff:
Deborah Marie Robinson-Foor
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv03007
Defendant:
Gail Marie Robinson and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mari Robinson v. Michael Astrue
as 11-2213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARI ROBINSON, on behalf of Sara Robinson, Rebecca Robinson, Elizabeth Robinson, and on behalf of Scott Schramm
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Mari Robinson v. Michael Astrue
as 11-2208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARI ROBINSON, on behalf of Sara Robinson, Rebecca Robinson, Elizabeth Robinson, and on behalf of Scott Schramm
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
