Cases 31 - 40 of 116
Bracamontes v. Saul
as 3:2020cv50511
Plaintiff:
Jorge Bracamontes
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Allen v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00089
Defendant:
Jason Lloyd Allen, Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
NELSON v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv06124
Defendant:
SSA COMMISSIONER ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
KATOSHA NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Smith v. Saul
as 1:2020cv12129
Plaintiff:
Chanel Taishea Smith
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Curtis v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 1:2020cv01140
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Curtis
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Not Classified By Court:
US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shadd v. Saul
as 4:2020cv12095
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Shadd
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Asanovsky v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01689
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Alija Asanovsky
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Mosley v. Saul
as 1:2020cv06367
Plaintiff:
Harriett Mosley
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Matthiscyk v. Saul
as 3:2020cv50404
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Matthiscyk
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ryans v. Saul
as 1:2020cv11823
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Brenda Ryans
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
