Cases 11 - 20 of 45
ExteNet Sytems, Inc. v. O'Fallon, Illinois, et al
as 3:2017cv01103
Plaintiff:
ExteNet Sytems, Inc.
Defendant:
City of O'Fallon, Illinois, Herb Roach, Ross Rosenberg and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
F.S. Sperry Co., Inc. v. Schopmann et al (TV1)
as 3:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
F.S. Sperry Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel Schopmann , Ronald Meadows , Jeremy Roach and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Roach v. Arrisi et al
as 8:2015cv02547
Plaintiff:
Marc-Gregory Roach
Defendant:
Vincent T. Arrisi and State of New Jersey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Michael Ries, et al v. Craig Curtis, et al
as 15-1524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL P. RIES and AMY RIES, h/w
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG T. CURTIS, SUSAN L. CURTIS, h/w, FOX & ROACH LP, DBA Prudential Fox & Roach Realtors and others
Thomas v. Kirschenbaum & Phillips, P.C. et al
as 7:2014cv06446
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
Kirschenbaum & Phillips, P.C., Roach &Murtha, P.C. and Peter T. Roach
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kharlamova v. Roach
as 3:2014cv05344
Petitioner:
Inna Kharlamova
Respondent:
Peter Roach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2014cv00624
Petitioner:
Inna Kharlamova
Respondent:
Peter Roach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Roach v. Evergreen Financial Services Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00077
Defendant:
Evergreen Financial Services Inc, Jennifer Doe and John Doe
Plaintiff:
John Roach
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Roach v. Dexter Axle Company et al
as 5:2013cv05544
Plaintiff:
John Roach, Jr.
Defendant:
Dexter Axle Company , Turlock RV Center, Inc., Norcold, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
RIES et al v. CURTIS et al
as 2:2013cv01400
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P. RIES and AMY RIES
Defendant:
CRAIG T. CURTIS, SUSAN L. CURTIS, FOX & ROACH, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2604 (c) Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (\"RESPA\")
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
