Cases 81 - 90 of 117
Rozar v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
as 3:2012cv02890
Plaintiff:
Sarah Rozar
Defendant:
First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jamelsky v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00809
Plaintiff:
Frank Jamelsky
Defendant:
First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Thomas v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01498
Plaintiff:
Melissa Thomas
Defendant:
First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nelson v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00534
Plaintiff:
Madonna L. Nelson
Defendant:
First National Collection Bureau, Inc., Calvary Portfolio Services, Portfolio Recovery Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Walker v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2012cv05389
Plaintiff:
Sheila Walker
Defendant:
First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
White v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
as 9:2012cv00105
Plaintiff:
Dorcas White
Defendant:
First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Garrett v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01501
Plaintiff:
Franklin Garrett
Defendant:
First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Van Der Hagen v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00470
Defendant:
First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark Van Der Hagen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Niemiec v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2012cv03725
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Niemiec
Defendant:
First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Andrews v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
as 2:2012cv11981
Plaintiff:
Daniel Andrews
Defendant:
First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
