Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Sewell v. Franklin Credit Management Corp., et al
as 2:2024at00794
Plaintiff:
Marvin A. Sewell
Defendant:
Franklin Credit Management Corporation, Bosco Credit, LLC and Prestige Default Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Sewell v. Franklin Credit Mgt. Corp., et al
as 2:2024cv01788
Defendant:
Bosco Credit, LLC, Franklin Credit Management Corporation and Prestige Default Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Marvin A. Sewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Bosco Habimana v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al.
as 2:2021cv09251
Plaintiff:
Bosco Habimana
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Habimana v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al.
as 1:2021cv01498
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, LOREN K. MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
BOSCO HABIMANA
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Arias et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2019cv00041
Plaintiff:
Karen Parro, Bernadette McHugh-Torres, Ricardo Asitimbay and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Arias et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11582
Plaintiff:
Camille Nicole Martin, Karen Zaccaria, Sean P. O'Brien and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Kante v. Credence Resource Management LLC
as 3:2017cv04619
Plaintiff:
Bosco Kante
Defendant:
Credence Resource Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Phelps v. Bosco
as 17-627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick H. Phelps
Defendant - Appellee:
Maureen Bosco, Executive Director of the Central New York Psychiatric Center, Margaret C. Drake, Assistant Counsel, New York State Office of Mental Health, New York State Office of Mental Health and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
