Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Brantley v. Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
Melody T. Brantley
Defendant:
Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC and Dollar Tree Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Brantley v. Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
Melody T. Brantley
Defendant:
Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC and Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sarber v. Communication Federal Credit Union et al
as 2:2018cv02507
Defendant:
Communication Federal Credit Union, Gregory D Bribiesca, Brantley & Brantley Adjusters, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sarber
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McSmith v. Brantley
as 1:2017mi00084
Plaintiff:
Derek LeRoy McSmith
Defendant:
G. Grant Brantley
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Oakey v. National Merchant Services, LLC
as 2:2016cv00836
Plaintiff:
Brantley Oakey
Defendant:
National Merchant Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
GAREY, et al v. JAMES S. FARRIN, P.C. et al
as 1:2016cv00542
Plaintiff:
JAMES WEAVER GAREY , WILLIAM PARKER GAREY and AARON KENT CRUTHIS
Defendant:
JAMES S. FARRIN, P.C. , MARCARI, RUSSOTTO, SPENCER & BALABAN, P.C. , RIDDLE & BRANTLEY, L.L.P and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brantley et al v. Credit Management, LP
as 2:2016cv11175
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Brantley , Wilhelmina Coleman and Cierra Hiner
Defendant:
Credit Management, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
John Brantley v. State of MD Baltimore Dist Ct
as 15-2229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN D. BRANTLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MD BALTIMORE CITY DISTRICT COURT
John Brantley v. State of MD-UMES
as 15-2224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN D. BRANTLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MD-UMES
John Brantley v. State of MD-OAG
as 15-2228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN D. BRANTLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MD-OAG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
