Cases 1 - 9 of 9
FOLA MBORIKA WILL I AM EL v. COLWELL
as 1:2020mc00003
Plaintiff:
FOLA MBORIKA WILL I AM EL
Defendant:
SCOTT COLWELL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Industrial Tower and Wireless, LLC v. Esposito et al
as 1:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
Industrial Tower and Wireless, LLC
Defendant:
John Esposito, Paula Mottshaw, David Paolino and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Perales v. Obama et al
as 3:2011cv00182
Defendant:
Richard Bruce Cheney, Peter Hoekstra, Christopher Samuel Bond and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KINGVISION PAY-PER-VIEW, LTD. v. COLWELL et al
as 2:2010cv00058
Plaintiff:
KINGVISION PAY-PER-VIEW, LTD.
Defendant:
JEFFREY COLWELL, CHARLES COLWELL, TIMOTHY M. LINZ and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Rick Jackson v. Smedema Trucking, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00094
Respondent:
Smedema Trucking, Inc.
Intervenor:
William S. Colwell, U.S. Department of Labor and U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
CONNER v. COLWELL et al
as 1:2007mc00350
Petitioner:
SUSAN M. CONNER
Respondent:
ROBBIE L. COLWELL
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007mc00325
Petitioner:
ALLEN DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROBBIE L. COLWELL
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Brown v. Colwell et al
as 3:2007cv00179
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Brown
Defendant:
Jason Colwell and Harris Teeter Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
Colwell, et al v. DHHS, et al
as 05-55450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD W. COLWELL, Jr., JOHN BROFMAN, LYNN I. DEMARCO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, Secretary of Dept. of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
