Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Brown v. Central Portfolio Control Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Bronson Brown
Defendant:
Central Portfolio Control Inc and Cascade Receivables Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
dhas v. CENTRAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL INC
as 2:2021cv01459
Defendant:
CENTRAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL INC
Plaintiff:
MADHUKAR DHAS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FLORENCE v. CENTRAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL, INC.
as 4:2020cv00083
Defendant:
CENTRAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL INC
Plaintiff:
PHILIP FLORENCE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cruz v. Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv02720
Plaintiff:
Malorie Cruz
Defendant:
Central Portfolio Control Inc. and Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
Peter J. Grilli
Peterson v. Central Portfolio Control Inc et al
as 6:2019cv00496
Defendant:
Central Portfolio Control Inc and Experian Information Solutions Inc.
Plaintiff:
Taylor Peterson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Burns v. Central Portfolio Control Inc.
as 3:2019cv00198
Defendant:
Central Portfolio Control Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Burns
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MASTELER v. CENTRAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL, INC.
as 5:2019cv00755
Defendant:
CENTRAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL, INC.
Plaintiff:
MELISSA MASTELER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Servin v. Central Portfolio Control Inc et al
as 1:2018cv01421
Defendant:
Central Portfolio Control Inc, JOHN AND JANES DOES 1 THROUGH 25 and John and Jane Does
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL SERVIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Schmidt v. Central Portfolio Control, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00854
Defendant:
Central Portfolio Control, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peggy Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Baez v. Central Portfolio Control, Inc.
as 8:2018cv00754
Plaintiff:
Andrew Baez
Defendant:
Central Portfolio Control, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
