Other Statutory Actions Cases
Nargol, et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1442
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, ex rel, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTONI NARGOL, Relator and DAVID LANGTON, Relator
Defendant - Appellee: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., DEPUY, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In re: Depuy Orthopaldics, Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015mc80259
Miscellaneou: Cardno Chemrisk, LLC and Dennis Paustenback
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Plaintiff: All Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Filing Error
as 3:2015cv00660
Plaintiff: Antoni Nargol and David Langton
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
United States of America v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv10896
Plaintiff: United States of America , State of Arkansas, State of California and others
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
THE NORTH JERSEY MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv02264
Plaintiff: THE NORTH JERSEY MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND
Defendant: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2008cv01221
Plaintiff: Richard E Jones, MD, Richard E Jones, MD, Richard E Jones, MD and others
Defendant: Depuy Orthopaedics Inc and Johnson & Johnson Professional Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
DORMER v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
as 3:2007cv01217
Petitioner: MICHAEL J. DORMER
Respondent: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
Defendant: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?