Other Statutory Actions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Eisele v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2024cv00764
Plaintiff: Kathleen Eisele
Defendant: Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vladimir Kruglyak v. Karen Phoebus
as 24-1156
Plaintiff: VLADIMIR KRUGLYAK, d/b/a Fruklyak, Inc.
Defendant: KAREN J. PHOEBUS and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INCORPORATED
Smith v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 24-1093
Plaintiff: PAMELA SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Incorrectly Filed
as 3:2023cv00390
Plaintiff: Lola Ross and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Divelbiss v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 2:2023xc05562
Plaintiff: Dustin Cheree Divelbiss
Defendant: Citibank, N.A. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Divelbiss v. Citibank N A et al
as 5:2023cv01343
Plaintiff: Dustin Cheree Divelbiss
Defendant: Citibank, N.A., Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Citibank N A and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv03258
Plaintiff: Christiana Keller and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc and Marselena Barnes
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Smith v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00294
Plaintiff: Pamela Smith
Defendant: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Harter v. The Home Depot, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03705
Plaintiff: Shan Harter
Defendant: The Home Depot, Inc. and Satco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harter v. The Home Depot, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03705
Plaintiff: Shan Harter
Defendant: The Home Depot, Inc. and Satco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?