Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ou-Young v. Roberts, Jr., et al
as 5:2014mc80174
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Claudia Wilken, Ronald M. Whyte and others
Debbie Washington v. Patrick Donahoe
as 14-1162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBBIE WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General for the United States Postal Service Capital Metro Area, PRINCE JONES, ANNETTA WALLACE, Retired and others
In Re: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE PRIVACY ACT PROTECTIVE ORDER
as 1:2013mc00501
Petitioner:
PATRICK R. DONAHOE
Cause Of Action: Motion for Protective Order
WASHINGTON v. DONAHOE et al
as 8:2013cv00339
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
Patrick R. Donahoe, PRINCE JONES, NIGEL MCCLEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WASHINGTON v. DONAHOE et al
as 1:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
PATRICK R. DONAHOE, PRINCE JONES, NIGEL MCCLEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IDROGO v. DONAHOE et al
as 1:2012cv02066
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL IDROGO
Defendant:
PATRICK R. DONAHOE, JO BONNER and HOPE ANDRADE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simpson v. Donahoe
as 1:2012cv00851
Plaintiff:
Lewis B. Simpson
Defendant:
Patrick R Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Felicia Jones v. CitiMortgage, Incorporated, et al
as 12-20406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELICIA N. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIMORTGAGE, INCORPORATED, PIONEER HOMES and PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General United States Postal Service
HARRIS v. DONAHOE et al
as 1:2012cv00145
Plaintiff:
ARETHA HARRIS
Defendant:
PATRICK R. DONAHOE and DOUG FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felicia Jones v. CitiMortgage, Incorporated, et al
as 11-20643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELICIA N. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIMORTGAGE INC, PIONEER HOMES and PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General United States Postal Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
