Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Lanard Toys Limited v. Toys R US-Delaware, Inc. et al
as 5:2022mc00038
Plaintiff:
Lanard Toys Limited
Defendant:
Toys R US-Delaware, Inc., Dolgencorp, LLC and JA-RU, Inc.
Lanard Toys Limited v. Toys R US-Delaware, Inc. et al
as 2:2022mc00154
Debtor In Possession:
Lanard Toys Limited
Not Classified By Court:
Ja-Ru, Inc., Dolgencorp, LLC and Toys "R" Us-Delaware, Inc.
Toys "R" US, Inc. et al v. AMIC Trading (PTY) LTD
as 1:2019cv07733
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey, LLC and Toys 'R' US, Inc.
Defendant:
AMIC Trading (PTY) LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Toys "R" US, Inc. et al v. AMIC Trading (PTY) LTD
as 3:2019cv00596
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey, LLC and Toys "R" US, Inc.
Defendant:
AMIC Trading (PTY) LTD
Interested Party:
USBC-Richmond (United States Bankruptcy Court)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Reisman v. Toys "R" Us, Inc.
as 1:2014cv24893
Plaintiff:
Helene T. Reisman
Defendant:
Toys "R" Us, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Reisman v. Toys "R" Us, Inc.
as 6:2014cv02121
Plaintiff:
Helene T. Reisman
Defendant:
Toys "R" Us, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Estanboulian v. Toyr 'R' Us-Delaware, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00586
Plaintiff:
Tamar Estanboulian
Defendant:
Toys 'R' Us-Delaware, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alexsam, Inc. v. Best Buy Stores LP et al
as 1:2012cv03651
Plaintiff:
Alexsam, Inc.
Defendant:
Best Buy Stores LP, Barnes & Noble, Inc., Barnes & Noble Marketing Services Corp. and others
Alexsam, Inc. v. Best Buy Stores LP et al
as 1:2012mi00176
Plaintiff:
Alexsam, Inc.
Defendant:
Best Buy Stores LP, Barnes & Noble, Inc., Barnes & Noble Marketing Services Corp. and others
Alexsam, Inc v. Best Buy Stores, LP et al
as 1:2012cv02499
Plaintiff:
Alexsam, Inc
Defendant:
Best Buy Stores, LP, Barnes & Noble, Inc., Barnes & Noble Marketing Services Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dd Fed. Question: Discovery Disputes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
