Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Chemetco Site PRP Group v. A Square Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00179
Defendant:
Agresta, LLC, A&B Recycling, Inc., Berger & Company Recycling, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Chemetco Site Prp Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. D'Agostinos Auto Sales & Salvage, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00230
Plaintiff:
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
D'Agostinos Auto Sales & Salvage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Clean Water Action v. United Salvage Corp. of America et al
as 1:2015cv10871
Defendant:
United Salvage Corp. of America
Plaintiff:
Clean Water Action
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance et al v, A-1 Metals and Auto Salvage, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09444
Defendant:
A-1 Metals and Auto Salvage, Inc., Michael Thompson and Sheryl Thompson
Plaintiff:
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance and Environmental Defense Center
Consolidation Coal Company v. PCS Phosphate Company, Incorpo
as 13-1666
Plaintiff:
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATION, TOWN OF BLACKSTONE, VIRGINIA and others
Third Party Defendant:
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY, BABSON COLLEGE and others
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. v. PCS Phosphate Company, Incorpo
as 13-1664
Plaintiff:
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellant:
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATION, TOWN OF BLACKSTONE, VIRGINIA and others
Third Party Defendant:
BARNES & POWELL ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC., TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, GEORGIA-PACIFIC, LLC and others
Oil Re-Refining Company, Inc. v. Sutton Salvage, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00236
Plaintiff:
Oil Re-Refining Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Sutton Salvage, LLC, Mitchell's Mobile Mashing and Mitchell L. Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Consolidation Coal Company v. Georgia Power Company
as 13-1617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY
Third Party Plaintiff:
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATION, TOWN OF BLACKSTONE, VIRGINIA and others
Third Party Defendant:
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY, BABSON COLLEGE and others
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. v. Consolidation Coal Company
as 13-1603
Plaintiff:
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., Progress Energy Carolinas, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellant:
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATION, TOWN OF BLACKSTONE, VIRGINIA and others
Third Party Defendant:
BARNES & POWELL ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC., TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, GEORGIA-PACIFIC, LLC and others
Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al
as 3:2013cv00115
Cross Claimant:
Pharmacia LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Dayton Power and Light Company
Counter Claimant:
Standard Register Company, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC, Valley Asphalt Corporation and others
Defendant:
Dayton Industrial Drum, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, Sherwin-Williams Company, "John Doe" Corporation(s) and others
Counter Defendant:
Harris Corporation, Franklin Iron & Metal Corp, City of Dayton, Ohio and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ronald H. Barnett, Dryden Road Investments, LLC, South Dayton Land Fill Remediation Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Hobart Corporation and Kelsey-Hayes Company doing business as ZF Active Safety US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
