Cases 11 - 20 of 561
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al
as 1:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MARTHA WILLIAMS and DEB HAALAND
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540 Endangered Species Act
Rethink35 et al v. Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Rethink35, Save Our Springs Alliance, Austin Justice Coalition and others
Defendant:
Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT), Marc Williams, United States Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
San Francisco Baykeeper v. United States Fish And Wildlife Service et al
as 3:2023cv06601
Plaintiff:
San Francisco Baykeeper
Defendant:
United States Fish And Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Gallatin Wildlife Association et al v. Erickson et al
as 9:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Gallatin Wildlife Association, Native Ecosystems Council and Wildearth Guardians
Defendant:
Mary Erickson, Randy Moore, United States Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Tonawanda Seneca Nation v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 1:2023cv01236
Plaintiff:
Tonawanda Seneca Nation
Defendant:
Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams, Thomas Roster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. U.S. OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2023cv03343
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and APPALACHIAN VOICES
Defendant:
U.S. OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT, GLENDA OWENS, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540 Endangered Species Act
Iesha Mitchell, et al v. City of Benton Harbor, MI, et al
as 23-1970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IESHA MITCHELL, Guardian and next friend of A.M., KEA N. BENNETT, Guardian and next friend of A.B. next friend of S.B., et al., CHRISTINE ANDERSON, Guardian and next friend of A.L.next friend of D.L. 1 next friend of D.L. 2 next friend of M.L. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BENTON HARBOR, MI, MARCUS MUHAMMAD, MICHAEL O'MALLEY and others
Grinnell et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 8:2023cv01265
Plaintiff:
William Grinnell, Frank Sheldon and Daniel Blanchette
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, New York State Department of Health and Town of Ticonderoga, New York
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Clean Water Act - Citizen Suits re Environmental Matters
The Successor Agency to The Former Emeryville Redevelopment Agency and The City of Emeryville v. Swagelok Company et al
as 3:2017cv00308
Plaintiff:
The Successor Agency to The Former Emeryville Redevelopment Agency and The City of Emeryville
Defendant:
Swagelok Company, William R Cosgrove, David B Cathcart and others
Cross Defendant:
Catherine Lennon Lozick and Hanson
Counter Claimant:
Hanson Building Materials Limited, a British Corporation
Cross Claimant:
Whitney Research Tool Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601 CERCLA
City of Torrance v. Hi-Shear Corporation
as 2:2017cv07732
Defendant:
Hi-Shear Corporation and Hi-Shear Corporation a Delaware corporation doing business as LISI Aerospace
Plaintiff:
City of Torrance
3Rd Party Defendant:
Pat Simmons Golf Company, EFCO, Inc a Pennsylvania corporation doing business as Erie Press Systems, Craig Frudenfeld and others
Cross Defendant:
Magellan, Middleton, Inc, Karla Frudenfeld, Wendi Frudenfeld and others
Counter Defendant:
Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc. and Robinson Helicopter Company, Incorporated
Counter Claimant:
Esterline Technologies Corporation, Recreational Vans, Inc, Lyman E Eddy Company and others
Cross Claimant:
DASCO Engineering Corporation
Intervenor:
Federal Insurance Company and Safeco Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
