Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Lyondell Chemical Co, et al v. Albemarle Corp, et al
as 08-40059
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
LYONDELL CHEMICAL CO and ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP
Defendant - Appellee:
EXXON MOBIL CORP, PPG INDUSTRIES INC and OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
LUBRIZOL CORP
Lyondell Chemical Co v. Albemarle Corp, et al
as 08-40061
Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
EPEC POLYMERS INC, EPEC CORP and EL PASO TENNESSEE PIPELINE CO
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO, formerly known as Tenneco Inc
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
LUBRIZOL CORP and OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP
Defendant - Appellee:
CHEVRON USA, INC., EXXON MOBIL CORP and PPG INDUSTRIES INC
Lyondell Chemical Co, et al v. Albemarle Corp, et al
as 08-40060
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
LYONDELL CHEMICAL CO and ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO
Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
EL PASO TENNESSEE PIPELINE CO, EPEC CORP and EPEC POLYMERS INC
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
LUBRIZOL CORP and OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP
Defendant - Appellee:
CHEVRON USA, INC., EXXON MOBIL CORP and PPG INDUSTRIES INC
Lyondell Chemical Co, et al v. Albemarle Corp, et al
as 08-40025
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
LYONDELL CHEMICAL CO and ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO
Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
EPEC POLYMERS INC, EPEC CORP and EL PASO TENNESSEE PIPELINE CO
Defendant - Appellee:
EXXON MOBIL CORP, PPG INDUSTRIES INC and CHEVRON USA, INC.
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO, formerly known as Tenneco Inc and OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
LUBRIZOL CORP
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, formerly known as Rhone Poulenc AG Company Inc
United States of America v. AC Products, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv06881
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
AC Products, Inc., A.G. Layne, Inc., AdvancePCS Holding Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America et al v. ACF Industries, LLC et al
as 4:2007cv01215
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Missouri, State of
Defendant:
ACF Industries, LLC, Campbell Soup Company, Cargill, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
United States Department of Justice vs. Rajendra Jamnadas
as 1:2007cv00491
3Rd Party Defendant:
Legacy Vulcan Corp., Dow Chemical Company, E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Ecology and Environment, Inc.
Defendant:
Rajendra Jamnadas, Stephen C. Lyon, Suzanne S. Lyon and others
Cross Defendant:
Cooper Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
USA v. Agere Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00155
Plaintiff:
United States Of America, United States Of America and United States Of America
Defendant:
Agere, Inc., Alcolac, Inc., Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
United States of America et al v. Industrial Excess Landfill, Inc. et al
as 5:1989cv01988
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of Ohio, Ohio Attorney General
Defendant:
Industrial Excess Landfill, Inc. , B.F. Goodrich Company , Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Industrial Excess Landfill, Inc. , B.F. Goodrich Company , Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. and others
3rd_party_plaintiff:
B.F. Goodrich Company , Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. , Goodyear Aerospace Corporation and others
3rd_pty_defendant:
binet Craft Company, Dynamerican, Roan Aerial and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
