Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Rethink35 et al v. Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Rethink35, Save Our Springs Alliance, Austin Justice Coalition and others
Defendant:
Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT), Marc Williams, United States Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Natural Land Institute v. The Greater Rockford Airport Authority et al
as 3:2021cv50410
Plaintiff:
Natural Land Institute
Defendant:
The Greater Rockford Airport Authority, The Greater Rockford Airport Authority Board of Commissioners, Michael P. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181
No More Freeways et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 3:2021cv00498
Plaintiff:
No More Freeways, Eliot Neighborhood Association and Neighbors for Clean Air
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Thomas D. Everett and United States Federal Highway Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT et al v. CHAO et al
as 1:2019cv03436
Defendant:
Sec. ELAINE L. CHAO, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff:
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT and SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
Petitioner:
CALPINE CORPORATION, POWER COMPANIES CLIMATE COALITION, NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY and others
Intervenor Defendant:
ASSOCIATION OF GLOBAL AUTOMAKERS, INC.
Intervenor:
COALITION FOR SUSTAINABLE AUTOMOTIVE REGULATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al v. CHAO et al
as 1:2019cv02826
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant:
ELAINE L. CHAO, NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, United States and others
Petitioner:
NATIONAL COALITION FOR ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, ASSOCIATION OF GLOBAL AUTOMAKERS, INC. and COALITION FOR SUSTAINABLE AUTOMOTIVE REGULATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND et al v. CHAO et al
as 1:2019cv02907
Defendant:
JAMES C. OWENS, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ACTING ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, ELAINE L. CHAO, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and others
Plaintiff:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, ENVIRONMENTAL LAW & POLICY CENTER, PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC. and others
Petitioner:
NATIONAL COALITION FOR ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, ASSOCIATION OF GLOBAL AUTOMAKERS, INC. and COALITION FOR SUSTAINABLE AUTOMOTIVE REGULATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Komor v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00293
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce, Christy Goldfuss, Mick Mulvancy and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Robert Komor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District et al
as 2:2017cv03412
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District , Jeffrey S Palazzini , Todd T Semonite and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
John Fitzgerald, et al v. FTA, et al
as 17-5175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John M. Fitzgerald, Friends of the Capital Crescent Trail and Christine Real de Azua
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Transit Administration, United States Department of Transportation, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
State of Maryland
John Fitzgerald, et al v. FTA, et al
as 17-5174
Plaintiff - Appellee:
John M. Fitzgerald, Friends of the Capital Crescent Trail and Christine Real de Azua
Defendant - Appellant:
Federal Transit Administration, United States Department of Transportation, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
State of Maryland
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
