Cases 21 - 30 of 86
Brown v. EDUC
as 22-11115
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Myra Brown and Alexander Taylor
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of Education and Miguel Cardona, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Education
Amicus Curiae:
Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, State of Utah and others
State of Tennessee, et al v. Department of Education, et al
as 22-5807
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, MIGUEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
ASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INTERNATIONAL, A.S., a minor, by Brandi Scarborough, her mother, C.F., a minor, by Sara Ford, her mother and others
State of Tennessee et al v. U.S. Department of Agriculture et al
as 3:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Thomas J Vilsack, Cindy Long and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Louisiana et al v. Horseracing Integrity & Safety Authority Inc et al
as 6:2022cv01934
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, Louisiana State Racing Commission, Louisiana Horsemens Benevolent & Protective Association 1993 Inc and others
Defendant:
Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority, Inc., Lisa Lazarus, Steve Beshear and others
Petitioner:
Arizona Horsemens Benevolent & Protective Association, Arkansas Horsemens Benevolent & Protective Association, Illinois Horsemens Benevolent & Protective Association and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas v. USA
as 22-40367
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas and State of Louisiana
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Arizona, State of Alabama, State of Florida and others
Louisiana et al v.Centers for Disease Control & Prevention et al
as 6:2022cv00885
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Arizona, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Rochelle Walensky, U S Dept of Health & Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Jodey C Arrington, Brian Babin, Jim Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
AZ, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 22-3272
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF MONTANA and STATE OF OHIO
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Amicus Curiae:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CA, CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, NM, CITY OF BOSTON, MA and others
State of Florida et al v. Walensky et al
as 8:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant:
ROCHELLE P WALENSKY, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, SHERRI A BERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
OH, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 21-4235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, JESSICA S. MARCELLA, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, in their official capacities, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
Louisiana et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2021cv04370
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, U S Dept of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children & Families and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
