Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 58
State of Florida v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2021cv00541
Plaintiff: State of Florida
Defendant: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy Miller and others
Amicus Curiae: ACLU of Florida, American Civil Liberties Union, Immigration Reform Law Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
State of Texas v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00003
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, David Pekoske, Troy Miller and others
Plaintiff: State of Texas
Amicus Curiae: ACLU Foundation of Texas, Inc., State of New York, Immigration Reform Law Institute and others
Petitioner: William F. Reade, Jr.
Intervenor: FIEL Houston and Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Gabriela Solano v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01576
Defendant: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Dir LA Field Ofc ICE David Marin, Acting Dir. ICE Tae D. Johnson and others
Plaintiff: Gabriela Solano
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv09253
Plaintiff: Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services, Inc. and others
Defendant: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Amicus Curiae: Members of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Kids in Need of Defense, Immigration Law Professors and others
Petitioner: Immigration Equality
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv07721
Defendant: Mark A Morgan, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham and others
Plaintiff: Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services and others
Petitioner: Immigration Equality
Amicus Curiae: Immigration Legal Services Organizations and Immigration Law Professors
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Valencia-Ayala et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv02060
Plaintiff: David Orellana-Ardon, Andrea Contreras-Vergara, Pedro Valencia-Ayala and others
Defendant: Gregory Archambeault, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham and others
Amicus Curiae: American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA)
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Doe v. Wolf et al
as 3:2020cv00481
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: USCIS, Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Doe 1 et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv09654
Plaintiff: DOE 8, DOE 1, DOE 6 and others
Defendant: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD R. WOLF and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
PORTILLO-MORENO v. WOLF et al
as 1:2020cv02097
Defendant: MATTHEW ALBENCE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ("USCIS") and others
Plaintiff: NYLSSA KRYSTHELLA PORTILLO-MORENO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2020cv04592
Defendant: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew Albence, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff: State of California
Not Classified By Court: The Regents of the University of California
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?