Cases 31 - 40 of 162
State of Texas et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant:
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D., Janet Woodcock, M.D. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Danco Laboratories, LLC and Danco Laboratories LLC
Amicus Curiae:
The Chattanooga National Memorial for the Unborn, Doctors for America, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Brown v. EDUC
as 22-11115
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Myra Brown and Alexander Taylor
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of Education and Miguel Cardona, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Education
Amicus Curiae:
Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, State of Utah and others
State of Nebraska, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 22-3179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Nebraska, State of Missouri, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as the President of the United States of America, Miguel Cardona, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Education and United States Department of Education
Appellant:
Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, Americans for Prosperity Foundation and New Civil Liberties Alliance
Women's Student Union v. USEDU
as 22-16016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WOMEN'S STUDENT UNION
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Petitioner:
STATE OF TEXAS, KEN PAXTON, In His Official Capacity as Attorney General of Texas, FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION and others
State of Texas v. USA
as 22-40367
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas and State of Louisiana
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Arizona, State of Alabama, State of Florida and others
State of LA v. Centers for Disease
as 22-30303
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, State of Arizona, State of Missouri and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Rochelle Walensky, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Innovation Law Lab
John Doe et al v. U.S Department of Justice et al
as 5:2022cv00855
Plaintiff:
John Doe and THE ALLIANCE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL SEX OFFENSE LAWS
Defendant:
U.S Department of Justice, Attorney General Merrick B Garland and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
In re: Metcalf
as 22-1506
Petitioner / Appellant:
RON DAVID METCALF, Parent/advocate, legal guardian as lawful guardian ad litem of Minor Child D. J. M. and CLAUDIA METCALF, Parent/advocate, legal guardian as lawful guardian ad litem of Minor Child D. J. M
Not Yet Classified:
D.J.M.
Health Freedom Defense Fund, et al v. President of the United States, et al
as 22-11287
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE FUND, A Wyoming Not-for-Profit Corporation, ANA CAROLINA DAZA, An individual and SARAH POPE, An individual
Defendant / Appellant:
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL and others
Not Classified By Court:
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION and PUBLIC HEALTH AND PUBLIC HEALTH LAW EXPERTS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
